Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

October 23 2014

FreXxX
22:34
After gas explosion in Ludwigshafen, Germany
Reposted fromdelacroix delacroix viafpletz fpletz
FreXxX
20:35
6772 37aa 400
Toasted marshmallow shots. Aw, yeah.
Reposted frombiru biru viafoods foods
20:34
7883 e302 400

ak47:

sakairyo:

takaakik:

toukubo:

trss:

photo by Perry Solomon, 2003

(via xplanes)

Reposted fromkimik kimik viabesen besen
FreXxX
20:31
7188 d56c 400
Reposted frommadaling madaling viabesen besen
FreXxX
20:20
The main trick behind the Hendo is a technology that its inventor calls “magnetic field architecture” (MFA). Despite Henderson “patenting the hell out of the idea” there are very few technical details of how MFA actually works. From various interviews, though, it sounds like MFA is essentially a way of focusing a magnetic field. By focusing the field, it theoretically becomes possible to gain the same amount of electromagnetic oomph while using less power — and if you tweak the field carefully, you can also use it for steering and balance, which are two of the biggest difficulties when it comes to maglev.
Reposted fromPhlogiston Phlogiston viamanxx manxx
FreXxX
20:19

becausebirds:

ducklings and catlings

Reposted fromthatsridicarus thatsridicarus viapulegon pulegon
FreXxX
19:14
7824 605a 400
Reposted fromskulllife skulllife viaBermik Bermik
19:13
1658 9a3a 400
Reposted frombwana bwana viaspace-invader space-invader
FreXxX
19:13
6116 c25e 400
Reposted fromkrucabomba krucabomba viashadowfax42 shadowfax42
FreXxX
15:44
Thank you, Captain Obvious
Reposted fromfunz1 funz1 viaBediko Bediko
FreXxX
15:43



skunkbear:

So photographer David Slater wants Wikipedia to remove a monkey selfie that was taken with his camera. As you can see from this screen shot, Wikipedia says no: the monkey pressed the shutter so it owns the copyright.

We got NPR’s in-house legal counsel, Ashley Messenger, to weigh in. She said:

Traditional interpretation of copyright law is that the person who captured the image owns the copyright. That would be the monkey. The photographer’s best argument is that the monkey took the photo at his direction and therefore it’s work for hire. But that’s not a great argument because it’s not clear the monkey had the intent to work at the direction of the photographer nor is it clear there was “consideration” (value) exchanged for the work. So… It’s definitely an interesting question! Or the photographer could argue that leaving the camera to see what would happen is his work an therefore the monkey’s capture of the image was really the photographer’s art, but that would be a novel approach, to my knowledge.

Reposted fromhairinmy hairinmy viafpletz fpletz
FreXxX
15:42
Reposted fromlubiesezamki lubiesezamki viashallow shallow
FreXxX
15:42
7872 b8a5 400
Martin-Gropius-Bau.
Reposted fromverronique verronique viaxsteadfastx xsteadfastx
FreXxX
15:39
FreXxX
15:39
Reposted fromliteon44 liteon44 viasfm sfm
FreXxX
15:37
FreXxX
15:35
7764 36af 400
Aircraft Carrier
Reposted fromMerari Merari
FreXxX
15:35
What Things Should Be Called
Reposted fromfunz1 funz1 viacoffeeandunicorns coffeeandunicorns
FreXxX
15:34
3633 e868 400
Reposted fromdeathrider deathrider viaRekrut-K Rekrut-K
FreXxX
15:34
3633 e868 400
Reposted fromdeathrider deathrider viaRekrut-K Rekrut-K
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.